<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.0.3" -->
<rss version="0.92">
<channel>
	<title>SantorumBlog</title>
	<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php</link>
	<description>Pennsylvania Senator Rick Santorum: Personal Responsibility, Economic Freedom, And Conservative Values</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 Dec 2006 06:36:05 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss092</docs>
	<language>en</language>
	
	<item>
		<title>PaWaterCooler.com</title>
		<description><![CDATA[We&#8217;re done here, but we continue elsewhere.
PaWaterCooler.com

]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/12/08/pawatercoolercom/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thank You</title>
		<description><![CDATA[ A message from Senator Santorum.
First, let me thank you for your support and your faith throughout this campaign and beyond.
I am so blessed to be surrounded by not only my loving family but so many wonderful supporters committed to the future of our state and our nation.
Although the results were not what we wanted, [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/17/thank-you/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Insane Hatred of the Evil Left</title>
		<description><![CDATA[This kind of garbage must be paid attention to, because not challenging evil people like Dan Savage and the moonbats of MoveOn.org and Daily Kos hurt Senator Santorum, since it gave their lies credibility.  You can&#8217;t just ignore these people - you have to defeat them.
Cliff Bostock is a typical example of a Santorum-hater, [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/15/the-insane-hatred-of-the-evil-left/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Casey Said He Would Vote For Sam Alito</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Senators Chuck Schumer and Pat Leahy are now saying that they will not support any originalist judicial nominee.
So if in 2007 or 2008 President Bush nominates someone else like Justice Sam Alito for a court, I will expect then Senator Bob Casey to vote in favor of his or her confirmation.
Bob Casey will be the [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/14/casey-said-he-would-vote-for-sam-alito/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Silent Bob, Still Around</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Brett Lieberman gets frustrated with Bob Casey.
Those were a long 20 months on the campaign trail and it was definitely frustrating for us dealing with the non-answer answers. Not quite as frustrating as it was for Santorum, but definitely frustrating.
But it&#8217;s over now. You can answer questions, especially ones that aren&#8217;t complicated or controversial.
Pennsyltuckians actually [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/14/silent-bob-still-around/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Bob Casey&#8217;s Choice - Be His Father, or Be Chuck Schumer&#8217;s Puppet</title>
		<description><![CDATA[He could really go either way right now.  Let&#8217;s hope that Bob Casey chooses to follow in his father&#8217;s footsteps and doesn&#8217;t end up like this, if only for the sake of Pennsylvania:


]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/13/bob-caseys-choice-be-his-father-or-be-chuck-schumers-puppet/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Casey Voters, Part 2</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A Casey voter replied to Alex&#8217;s post below with this:
&#8220;PRO-LIFE wins when you have a Senator who not only supports the anti-abortion movement but also is against the death penalty a true PRO-LIFER.&#8221;
From BobCasey.com:
&#8220;Democratic opponent Bob Casey shares many of Santorum&#8217;s beliefs. He is pro-life, pro-Second Amendment and favors the death penalty.&#8220;

]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/13/casey-voters-part-2/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Getting It Right</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I find it funny how Santorum statement was endlessly misreported and misstated (despite John L&#8217;s repeated attempts to correct the record), yet after the election, it&#8217;s presented correctly.
His 2003 comments about gay marriage - legalizing it could result in future protections for polygamy, incest and bestiality - hardened his image. His decision to spend most [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/13/getting-it-right/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Partial-Birth Abortion Extremism</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Senator Rick Santorum: What we are talking about here with partial birth, as the senator from California knows, is a baby is in the process of being born - -
Senator Barbara Boxer: &#8220;The process of being born.&#8221; This is why this conversation makes no sense, because to me it is obvious when a baby is [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/12/partial-birth-abortion-extremism/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Far-Left Denies Reality</title>
		<description><![CDATA[One of the millions of mindless far-left bloggers disagrees with my extremely obvious observation that 2006 was an election year properly characterized as an anti-Republican backlash:
Far-left blogger: No, John, Rick lost.
The blogger asks all of his &#8220;Republican friends&#8221; to come over to SantorumBlog and correct me for saying that 2006 was an anti-Republican year.  [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/12/far-left-denies-reality/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Blaming Santorum</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Republican Majority for Choice:
The pro-active extreme agenda of Senator Rick Santorum and his fellow extreme right cohorts such as Falwell and Robertson were responsible for the loss of this key Senate seat, among others.
Pa&#8217;s other Senator, Arlen Specter is still on the advisory board.
Some previous posts about RMC:
Specter&#8217;s Defense
Hunt for Real Republicans
Featherman &#038; RMC

]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/12/blaming-santorum/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Casey Voters</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Colin McNickle, who is admittedly no fan of Senator Santorum, gives us a glimpse:
&#8220;The telephone call of the week &#8212; actually four and obviously orchestrated &#8212; came from the Tarentum area on Thursday regarding Wednesday&#8217;s editorial on the Rendell and Casey victories.
One caller took offense to calling Rendell a &#8220;stinking fish,&#8221; a term first used [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/12/casey-voters/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Thoughts on a Santorum Run for President</title>
		<description><![CDATA[From the Lebanon Daily News, which doesn&#8217;t seem to like Senator Santorum very much:
&#8220;Some have speculated that Santorum may run for president in 2008. That belief has been fueled by his Churchillian turn to foreign policy and radical Islam during the final days of his campaign against Bob Casey. But a Santorum run seems a [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/12/thoughts-on-a-santorum-run-for-president/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Pro-Life Loses in Pennsylvania</title>
		<description><![CDATA[National Catholic Register
His dedication to the cause was typified by an unforgettable moment on the Senate floor one day in October 1999, when he confronted Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif, on the issue of partial-birth abortion.
What if, Santorum asked Boxer, almost facetiously, in the course of the partial-birth abortion, the baby’s foot was inside the mother [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/11/pro-life-loses-in-pennsylvania/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Earning Respect</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Renita Fennick
Rick Santorum lost the election for all the right reasons.
He’s passionate about his beliefs, even when they’re unpopular or old-fashioned.
He’s loyal to his party and his president.
He’s a devoted husband and father, even if it leads to criticism over where he lives.
He’s committed to principle, true to his conscience, and not afraid to stand [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/11/earning-respect/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Rick Santorum for President!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[Then he can live in the White House, and the leftist media can complain that he doesn&#8217;t drive from 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue to his home in Penn Hills every night.
Mark Levin:
&#8220;I&#8217;m going against today&#8217;s conventional wisdom and suggesting that Rick Santorum and George Allen should consider running for the Republican presidential nomination.  It certainly [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/10/rick-santorum-for-president/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The Future</title>
		<description><![CDATA[PennLive/AP
Sen. Rick Santorum on Thursday defended his decision to talk during his Senate campaign about what he perceives as threats from a number of countries around the globe — and said he will continue to speak on the issue.
&#8220;I do not rescind a word because those words are words that this country was not receptive [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/10/the-future/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Eternal Optimism and the Message of the Election</title>
		<description><![CDATA[The message to the Republican Party is clear - reclaim your conservative roots or be condemned to minority status for decades.
The Republicans must immediately begin to convincingly work for the conservative principles which they promised to support when they got elected.  As Michael Savage says, Borders, Language, Culture.  Republicans had four years to [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/09/eternal-optimism-and-the-message-of-the-election/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>Gerlach and Murphy Survive the Bloodbath!</title>
		<description><![CDATA[A bit of good news in an otherwise bad situation - Jim Gerlach and Tim Murphy have managed to get re-elected.  That&#8217;s Alex&#8217;s and my Congressman, respectively.  So while I have no regrets about giving Senator Santorum as much cheerleading as possible, it&#8217;s nice that it&#8217;s kind of like we both got something [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/09/gerlach-and-murphy-survive-the-bloodbath/</link>
			</item>
	<item>
		<title>The State of the Chessboard</title>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#8217;ve been thinking about it, and it&#8217;s really not that bad.  Sure, we&#8217;ve lost the best Senator in the US Senate for basically no good reason, and that hurts, but now we need to concentrate on the big picture, and that means the victory of conservatism.
But first, now that I have it all figured [...]]]></description>
		<link>http://santorumblog.com/index.php/2006/11/08/the-state-of-the-chessboard/</link>
			</item>
</channel>
</rss>
